🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn followers viewing you as a industry expert? Do numerous respondents praising your advice on expanding your business? Do recruiters making contact to discuss opportunities?

Should that not be the case, the reason could be your gender.

The Test: Changing Profile Gender to achieve Increased Reach

Numerous female professionals participated in a collective professional network test recently following viral posts indicated that changing their profile gender to "man" boosted their platform visibility.

Other testers modified their profiles to include what they called "bro-coded" terminology - adding results-driven business buzzwords like "propel", "transform" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their visibility similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Concerns Brought Up

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether a built-in gender bias in the platform's system favors men who employ online business jargon.

Like many large social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to decide which content appear to which members - promoting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the phenomenon but stated it does not consider "personal characteristics" when deciding content distribution. Instead, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" affect how posts are received.

Modifying profile gender on your profile does not affect how your posts shows up in results or timelines.

Individual Results

A social media consultant, who changed her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her profile name to "Simon E", reported remarkable outcomes.

"The statistics I'm observing show a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a 1,300% increase in content views," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, started testing after noticing her audience decrease significantly.

The Method

• Initially, she modified her gender to "male"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rewrite her profile using "male-coded" language
• Lastly, she recycled previous content with comparable "agentic" style

The outcome was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in reach within one week.

The Negative Aspect

Although the positive results, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the approach.

"Before, my posts were softer - brief and clever, but also friendly and relatable," she explained. "Now, the masculine version was forceful and self-assured - like a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She abandoned the experiment after one week, stating "Each day I continued, and outcomes improved, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Not all testers encountered positive results. Cass Cooper who modified both her profile gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "white" reported a decrease in reach and interaction.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to understand how it operates in specific cases or why," she commented.

Broader Implications

These experiments coincide with ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a business platform and community site.

Platform modifications in recent months have reportedly caused female creators experiencing markedly lower exposure, resulting in unofficial tests where the same content by men and women received vastly different reach.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to categorize and distribute posts based on various elements, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company states it regularly evaluates its systems, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

Company representative suggested that recent declines in certain members' visibility might originate from increased competition due to additional posts on the network.

Changing Landscape

As one participant observed, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she remarked. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and less controlled."